How SI decides what it can responsibly publish.
SI publishes canonical doctrine, evidence-led analysis, research summaries, executive interpretation, Founder perspectives, client evidence stories, illustrative demonstrations and promotional content. These do not carry the same evidential weight.
Approved SI architecture and definitions.
Interpretation grounded in identified evidence and visible limitations.
Synthesis of attributed external sources.
Professional judgement presented as interpretation.
A named viewpoint that does not automatically become canonical doctrine.
Permissioned or appropriately anonymised, with retained evidence.
Hypothetical or representative, labelled as not a client result.
Still subject to evidence and claim controls.
For every material claim, we record the source, period, scope, method, evidence status, limitation, reviewer, approver and review date.
Unknown must not be removed merely because it makes the story less convenient.
AI may organise, compare, summarise, draft, edit and support preliminary analysis. It may not approve its own output, invent evidence, infer permission, alter canonical doctrine, expose confidential information or convert Inferred into Validated.
When a correction is required, we record the previous wording, corrected wording, reason, date, owner, affected assets and supersession.